Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Intracellular Accumulation of IFN-λ4 Induces ER Stress and Results in Anti-Cirrhotic but Pro-HCV Effects
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.692263
Figure Lengend Snippet: IFN-λ4 inhibits the proliferation of HepG2 cells. RNA-sequencing analysis was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs, P-FDR < 0.05) in IFN-λ3-GFP, IFN-λ4-GFP and IFN-λ4-GFP-IFNLR1 KO HepG2 cells after 72 hrs of induction by dox, compared to controls (dox- conditions). The cutoff threshold (fold change > +/-1.5) is indicated by dotted lines. (A) Analysis of all DEGs (n = 3251) detected for IFN-λ4-GFP or IFN-λ4-GFP-IFNLR1 KO cells. In blue - DEGs (n = 2,735) specific to IFN-λ4-GFP and considered IFNLR1-dependent. In black - DEGs (n = 145) shared between both groups and considered IFNLR1-independent. In orange - DEGs (n = 371) specific to IFN-λ4-GFP-IFNLR1 KO . (B) DEGs of IFN-λ4-GFP analyzed in IFN-λ3-GFP transcriptome. In black - DEGs (n = 1,506) shared in IFN-λ4-GFP and IFN-λ3-GFP and in blue - IFN-λ4-signature DEGs (n = 1,229) detected in IFN-λ4-GFP but not in IFN-λ3-GFP producing cells. Additional details are provided in and . (C, D) Cell cycle analysis of cells synchronized by 24 hrs of serum starvation, treated with or without dox (0.5 µg/ml) for 72 hrs, and analyzed by flow cytometry after PI staining. The plot shows a representative picture and the percentage of cells in each phase of the cell cycle. All data are shown as mean± SEM from triplicate experiments. *P < 0.05, Student’s T-test comparing no dox to dox+ for each cell cycle stage. (E, F) Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, %) incorporation indicating cell proliferation in HepG2 cells expressing IFN-λ3-GFP, IFN-λ4-GFP and IFN-λ4-GFP-IFNLR1KO. Cells were cocultured with HepG2 cells labeled with Far Red proliferation dye, dox-induced for 72 hrs, and treated with BrdU for 3 hrs before analysis. Gates show HepG2 cells exposed to IFN-λs (IFN-λ treated cells) and HepG2 expressing IFN-λs. P-values compare corresponding dox+ vs. dox- HepG2 cells, **p < 0.01, Student’s T-test. Graphs represent one of three independent experiments, each in biological triplicates.
Article Snippet: The membranes were probed with primary antibodies against IFNLR1 (#NBP1-84381, Novus Biologicals), STAT1 (#9172, Cell Signaling Technology), phospho-STAT1 (Tyr701, #58D6, Cell Signaling Technology), IFN-λ4 (ab196984; Abcam), GAPDH (ab37168, Abcam) and HRP-linked secondary antibody, goat anti-rabbit IgG (#7074; Cell Signaling Technology) or goat anti-mouse IgG (San Cruz, sc-2031).
Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Cell Cycle Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, BrdU Incorporation Assay, Expressing, Labeling